Home » Blogs » Wallace Shackleton » Photo screening - the times they are a changing.
Photo screening - the times they are a changing.
I'm posting this on the behalf of the AP-crew to keep you up to date with the changes that we are making in the screening process.
Previously a screener, who is a full member could open an image for screening and he would have ten minutes to check the information, add any additional information and screen the photo. I my case I would copy the picture to Photoshop and look at it more critically, especially for sharpness.
At this point a screener could go with one of three options: Accept, Reject or go for a Second Opinion from another screener.
There was a few problems with this process so Martin, the coding genius that he is changed the way we do the screening process.
Now each photo is screened by two screeners before it is accepted, or rejected. The first screener will make any additions or corrections to the database and screen the photo and make a recommendation to either accept or reject the photo, with hopefully comments on any shortfalls the picture may have.
The second screener checks the firsts work and makes his own opinion on the image. An accept will allow the photo onto the database.
The system is still in a state of flux so it may change slightly.
On a personal note the vast majority of rejections stem from the image not being sharp enough.
Posted for no better reason that it is a good photo.
Previously a screener, who is a full member could open an image for screening and he would have ten minutes to check the information, add any additional information and screen the photo. I my case I would copy the picture to Photoshop and look at it more critically, especially for sharpness.
At this point a screener could go with one of three options: Accept, Reject or go for a Second Opinion from another screener.
There was a few problems with this process so Martin, the coding genius that he is changed the way we do the screening process.
Now each photo is screened by two screeners before it is accepted, or rejected. The first screener will make any additions or corrections to the database and screen the photo and make a recommendation to either accept or reject the photo, with hopefully comments on any shortfalls the picture may have.
The second screener checks the firsts work and makes his own opinion on the image. An accept will allow the photo onto the database.
The system is still in a state of flux so it may change slightly.
On a personal note the vast majority of rejections stem from the image not being sharp enough.
Posted for no better reason that it is a good photo.
This blog post was published by Wallace Shackleton on
April 6th 2008, 12:20:16 CET | 996 views
Comments
1 vg-photo
(12. 4. 2008, 17:05 CET)
If I may add something. Check for dust spots before submitting too. I learned that myself
by getting into a bit of a hurry to get some photos posted. I was focusing on the airplane
only, then getting a rejection for dust spots that were very clearly there. I missed them
because I wasn't looking at the whole shot.
I find that the screening process
here is fair and way more consistent than on anet.
News | |
|
Egyptair's first Boeing 777-300ER flies!Views: 521Published on February 20th 2010 in section |
|
Emergency landing in Gdańsk RębiechowoViews: 541Published on March 8th 2010 in section |
|
Mercury Bay Air Show - Whitianga 6th March 2010Views: 332Published on March 6th 2010 in section |
| More News... | |
Blogs | |
| More Blogs... | |






