Airplane Pictures home

Home » Forums » Photo feedback » Is it that bad?

Is it that bad?

David Pauritsch

Member
Joined in February 2013
Posts: 20
Posted 11 February 2015 - 19:16 CET

Hi!

I recetly tried to upload a picture I have edited. I put a lot of efforts into this picture but it was rejected more than once... I only try to be creative, because that's what this website is for. But editing a picture like this and maintain (or create) perfect quality is nearly impossible...

So I want to ask you, what don't you like about this picture?

How do you think I could improve it?

Would it ever be possible to edit it so that it's okay for aap.net?

Thank you very much and have a nice evening! :)

Attached photos:

Marcel Kellner 
Member
Joined in November 2011
Posts: 6
Posted 11 February 2015 - 19:41 CET

Hi David,

I would say, that this photo is over-processed.

Best regards

Marcel

David Pauritsch

Member
Joined in February 2013
Posts: 20
Posted 11 February 2015 - 19:47 CET

You're right... I just tried to reduce the problems the screeners mentioned.

Thanks for your reply!

pl6txx
Member
Joined in February 2015
Posts: 11
Posted 11 February 2015 - 20:41 CET

It's not over-processed contrast-wise - but the sharpness is strange.

Christopher Vondra 

Member
Joined in December 2012
Posts: 3
Posted 12 February 2015 - 18:26 CET

Hey David!

I'm not a screener, i'm just a normal A-P.net photographer who had enough pics rejected ;)

First of all i really like this picture. If i'm a screener i would say that the LH-Logo and the windows of the main deck are oversharpenend and look "edgy". The edges especially of the windows are clearly visible. Just my personal opinion, and maybe thats the reason why i'm not a screener :)

For me it's a picture where i spent more time as usual to look at it, means it catch my eye.

Greets from LNZ

Chris

David Pauritsch

Member
Joined in February 2013
Posts: 20
Posted 12 February 2015 - 18:53 CET

Hi everyone!

Since you told me the picture was over-processed, I decided to start all over again.

I am now finished and I feel better about the picture, but it's still not good... The sharpness is still weird.

Probably a perfect example for a picture that was not good enough out of the camer to rework it like this...

What do you think might still be worth improving? Or what is still not good?

This post has been edited by David Pauritsch on 12th February 2015 - 18:57

Attached photos:

Christopher Vondra 

Member
Joined in December 2012
Posts: 3
Posted 12 February 2015 - 19:00 CET

Hey!

My opinion: I like it, it catch my eye and i would add it into database ;) but i'm not a screener :)

Chris

Jose I. Soria 

Full member
Joined in April 2014
Posts: 39
Posted 12 February 2015 - 23:17 CET

It's an eyecatcher shot...

Oliver Louis

Full member
Joined in January 2015
Posts: 47
Posted 18 February 2015 - 15:54 CET

Tolles Foto David, gefällt mir sehr. Die Schärfe ist beim zweiten versuch schon besser, allerdings stören die Treppeneffekt beispielsweise an den Cockpitscheiben noch etwas.

Jump to the top

Log in to post in the forum.

Terms and Conditions | About | FAQ | Photo Use | Privacy Policy | Online 1383 (22 members)
© 2006-2024 Airplane-Pictures.net | E-mail us: Team@Airplane-Pictures.net
All photos are copyright © to their respective photographers and may not be used without permission.