Home » Forums » Photo feedback » Is it that bad?
David Pauritsch Member Joined in February 2013 Posts: 20 |
Posted 11 February 2015 - 19:16 CET |
Hi!
I recetly tried to upload a picture I have edited. I put a lot of efforts into this picture but it was rejected more than once... I only try to be creative, because that's what this website is for. But editing a picture like this and maintain (or create) perfect quality is nearly impossible... So I want to ask you, what don't you like about this picture?
How do you think I could improve it?
Would it ever be possible to edit it so that it's okay for aap.net?
Thank you very much and have a nice evening! :) Attached photos: |
Marcel Kellner Member Joined in November 2011 Posts: 6 |
Posted 11 February 2015 - 19:41 CET |
Hi David,
I would say, that this photo is over-processed.
Best regards
Marcel |
David Pauritsch Member Joined in February 2013 Posts: 20 |
Posted 11 February 2015 - 19:47 CET |
You're right... I just tried to reduce the problems the screeners mentioned. Thanks for your reply! |
pl6txx Member Joined in February 2015 Posts: 11 |
Posted 11 February 2015 - 20:41 CET |
It's not over-processed contrast-wise - but the sharpness is strange. |
Christopher Vondra Member Joined in December 2012 Posts: 3 |
Posted 12 February 2015 - 18:26 CET |
Hey David!
I'm not a screener, i'm just a normal A-P.net photographer who had enough pics rejected ;)
First of all i really like this picture. If i'm a screener i would say that the LH-Logo and the windows of the main deck are oversharpenend and look "edgy". The edges especially of the windows are clearly visible. Just my personal opinion, and maybe thats the reason why i'm not a screener :)
For me it's a picture where i spent more time as usual to look at it, means it catch my eye.
Greets from LNZ
Chris |
David Pauritsch Member Joined in February 2013 Posts: 20 |
Posted 12 February 2015 - 18:53 CET |
Hi everyone!
Since you told me the picture was over-processed, I decided to start all over again. I am now finished and I feel better about the picture, but it's still not good... The sharpness is still weird. Probably a perfect example for a picture that was not good enough out of the camer to rework it like this... What do you think might still be worth improving? Or what is still not good?
This post has been edited by David Pauritsch on 12th February 2015 - 18:57 Attached photos: |
Christopher Vondra Member Joined in December 2012 Posts: 3 |
Posted 12 February 2015 - 19:00 CET |
Hey!
My opinion: I like it, it catch my eye and i would add it into database ;) but i'm not a screener :)
Chris |
Jose I. Soria Full member Joined in April 2014 Posts: 39 |
Posted 12 February 2015 - 23:17 CET |
It's an eyecatcher shot... |
Oliver Louis Full member Joined in January 2015 Posts: 47 |
Posted 18 February 2015 - 15:54 CET |
Tolles Foto David, gefällt mir sehr. Die Schärfe ist beim zweiten versuch schon besser, allerdings stören die Treppeneffekt beispielsweise an den Cockpitscheiben noch etwas. |
Log in to post in the forum.