Home » Forums » Civil aviation » Malaysia B772ER registration
Forums home | Start new topic | Jump to the last reply
Emanuel Linert ![]() ![]() Facebook admin Joined in March 2009 Posts: 238 |
Posted 21 January 2012 - 20:22 CET |
|
Good evening guys,
I took this shot last August in Los Angeles but unfortunately I don't know the registration. The varnish on the nose of this 777 is quite conspicuous so I thought maybe you know the reg? You'd help me a lot, thanks! :-)
Emanuel
This post has been edited by Martin Krupka on 21st January 2012 - 20:29 |
Kas van Zonneveld ![]() ![]() Full member Joined in December 2011 Posts: 14 |
Posted 22 January 2012 - 02:12 CET |
|
9M-MRD
http://www.airliners.net/photo/Malaysia-Airlines/Boeing-777-2H6-ER/1993571/L/ |
Wallace Shackleton ![]() ![]() Database admin Joined in February 2007 Posts: 1370 |
Posted 22 January 2012 - 08:33 CET |
|
That's a sub standard shot even for a.net!
Please see comment below. This post has been edited by Wallace Shackleton on 22nd January 2012 - 10:14 |
Martin Krupka ![]() ![]() Founder Joined in July 2006 Posts: 636 |
Posted 22 January 2012 - 08:43 CET |
|
Why? Good light, pin sharp. |
Tony Scruton ![]() Member Joined in January 2008 Posts: 39 |
Posted 22 January 2012 - 09:49 CET |
|
After your last reply to my FB comment you make a post like that? The pic, both of them, in fact, look fine to me! Do I detect hypocrisy? Which is exactly what wastes most screened sites, especially when "full members" are allowed to upload unscreened! |
Martin Krupka ![]() ![]() Founder Joined in July 2006 Posts: 636 |
Posted 22 January 2012 - 09:58 CET |
|
I thought Wallace is talking about Emanuel's photo (which he probably wasn't) and I was referring to that sky shot. |
Wallace Shackleton ![]() ![]() Database admin Joined in February 2007 Posts: 1370 |
Posted 22 January 2012 - 10:13 CET |
|
I was referring the the photo on Airliners, it's should have been given a BLURRY rejection by the a.net screener.
I'm sorry if I gave the impression that it was Emmanuel's photo. There is nothing wrong with it. This post has been edited by Wallace Shackleton on 22nd January 2012 - 10:14 |
Martin Krupka ![]() ![]() Founder Joined in July 2006 Posts: 636 |
Posted 22 January 2012 - 10:17 CET |
|
My mistake, I did not understand you correctly, sorry. This post has been edited by Martin Krupka on 22nd January 2012 - 10:18 |
Murmeldeier ![]() Member Joined in August 2008 Posts: 30 |
Posted 22 January 2012 - 10:36 CET |
|
Just out or curiosity ... is the picture really blurry or are they so "fussy" on a.net ? Because honestly I do not see it blurry ... (on the other hand I never tried to upload on a.net ...) |
Wallace Shackleton ![]() ![]() Database admin Joined in February 2007 Posts: 1370 |
Posted 22 January 2012 - 11:53 CET |
|
I had not noticed this until a photographic judge pointed this out. Our eyes are naturally drawn to writing, subconsciously we want to read the text and I am going to leave it at that. |
Emanuel Linert ![]() ![]() Facebook admin Joined in March 2009 Posts: 238 |
Posted 22 January 2012 - 18:03 CET |
|
Thanks for your help, just added the reg!
cheers |
Log in to post in the forum.