Screening

Forums home | Start new topic | Jump to the last reply

Dmitry-UWGG

Member
Joined in April 2015
Posts: 4

Posted 23 February 2016 - 21:52 CET

Comrades Screener , you really like there to agree among themselves - a sharp object or not , whether it is necessary to add contrast or nothing at all can not be done.

1. http://www.airplane-pictures.net/images/rejected-images/2016-2/672189.jpg - "Second opinion. Some dust spots visible in the sky.".

2. http://www.airplane-pictures.net/images/rejected-images/2016-2/673186.jpg - "Second opinion. Main object is not sharp."

3. http://www.airplane-pictures.net/images/rejected-images/2016-2/674824.jpg - "Incorrect exposure - too light. Photo lacks contrast. Main object is not sharp.".

The photos in all three cases are the same , only the first was spot on, and the other two do not.

Angelo Bufalino

Full member
Joined in May 2011
Posts: 420

Posted 26 February 2016 - 06:57 CET

Dmitrij,

I looked at the "other two" They do need more with regard to sharpness. Always get contrast right before you sharpen. You will yield better results that way. If you'd like any tips feel free to see my youtube channel.

We most definitely get no enjoyment out of rejecting photos. I wish we could just accept them all but we can't

https://www.youtube.com/user/MMP757/videos

Angelo

This post has been edited by on 26th February 2016 - 18:50

Dmitry-UWGG Member Joined in April 2015 Posts: 4	Posted 27 February 2016 - 20:50 CET
	Angelo, thank you! Be sure to see your video tutorials .

Jump to the top