Really disappointed this one got rejected. Why?

Forums home | Start new topic | Jump to the last reply

Tony Thomas
Member
Joined in January 2017
Posts: 19

Posted 28 March 2017 - 02:34 CET

Please tell me what you see wrong with this. Be as critical as possible because I will learn from it.

Attached photos:

Alexander Babashov

Full member
Joined in June 2012
Posts: 25

Posted 28 March 2017 - 03:46 CET

1.Noise in the sky

2.Over-light in the bow of airplane

3.heat haze on the fuselage and on the vertical stabilizer

4.over-sharpened halo on the wheels

It is just my opinion.

Tony Thomas Member Joined in January 2017 Posts: 19	Posted 28 March 2017 - 05:23 CET
	Your opinion is much appreciated. Thanks for the input. It got rejected for noise in sky. What software do you use to check digital noise?

Maurits E Full member Joined in November 2012 Posts: 28	Posted 28 March 2017 - 10:07 CET
	Try NIK Dfine.

Tony Thomas Member Joined in January 2017 Posts: 19	Posted 28 March 2017 - 23:28 CET
	Now that it is free I will try it. Thanks

Jetzguy

Member
Joined in July 2016
Posts: 139

Posted 29 March 2017 - 00:32 CET

Tony,

You can select the option (just before submitting) to move the airplane pictures logo higher or lower so it is either above (in this case) or below the plane. The logo can add to the photo instead of creating a visual distraction from being so close to the main subject :-) It is all up to you and what you like best. Welcome to the site.

Tony Thomas Member Joined in January 2017 Posts: 19	Posted 29 March 2017 - 04:48 CET
	Thanks for that suggestion Jetzguy.

PeterE Member Joined in May 2017 Posts: 13	Posted 24 May 2017 - 14:41 CET
	Noise and over sharpened would be my thought. Heat over the tail can be written off as exhaust. Something it seems many screeners don't get.

Lee Aspinall Member Joined in February 2017 Posts: 2	Posted 17 July 2017 - 11:58 CET
	The sky is way too noisy. And there"s a big halo around the plane - I think you used to much clarity.

Jump to the top