Airplane Pictures home

Home » Forums » Photo feedback » Ridiculous Rejection

Ridiculous Rejection

Enda G Burke 

Full member
Joined in April 2016
Posts: 28
Posted 3 October 2018 - 09:28 CET

This image was rejected due to be soft, in my opinion, its sharp. Thoughts?

Will happily take any constructive criticism.

The screener in question is very harsh and I am not the only one to suffer


Joined in July 2016
Posts: 159
Posted 3 October 2018 - 11:02 CET

Is nice sharp, appeal the photos.


Joined in June 2014
Posts: 65
Posted 3 October 2018 - 17:21 CET

Parts could do with more sharpening (windows, flag etc) but I would say it is probably acceptable is. Appeal is worth a shot. And roger that on the screener. Its pretty bad lol.

Karol Trojanowski 

Senior admin
Joined in June 2016
Posts: 82
Posted 3 October 2018 - 21:59 CET

I would suggest more sharpening on cockpit's windows, and on the tail (and rear part of fuselage). Or maybe try smaller size - 1440px could be a better choice.


Joined in July 2016
Posts: 139
Posted 3 October 2018 - 23:54 CET

Enda. I have been enjoying your photography. Nice work.

Enda G Burke 

Full member
Joined in April 2016
Posts: 28
Posted 4 October 2018 - 08:47 CET

Thank you jetzguy

Marek Horák 

Full member
Joined in October 2016
Posts: 13
Posted 31 October 2019 - 13:15 CET

Enough sharp for me, nice one! Need to come to MAN when the 747s are still flying.

Darryl Morrell 

Full member
Joined in August 2008
Posts: 144
Posted 2 November 2019 - 14:16 CET

This is where this site falls flat on its face, In one hand you have a nice composed photo that has been rejected for being soft. On the other hand there are a lot of grossly over edited photos which are not creative as the site logo suggests that are as soft as and sometimes blurry. Where is the balance on here with those, there doesnt seem to be any quality control at all anymore and some of the photos that get though screening are ghastly, come on admin get some consistency on here while its still a decent site

Kamil Cison 

Joined in January 2013
Posts: 112
Posted 2 November 2019 - 21:09 CET

^ Not to mention silly censorship of the comments and the forums, whenever someone DARES to criticizes this site, its screeners or the published photos :)

Jump to the top

Log in to post in the forum.

Terms and Conditions | About | FAQ | Photo Use | Privacy Policy | Online 1431 (32 members)
© 2006-2022 | E-mail us:
All photos are copyright © to their respective photographers and may not be used without permission.