This image was rejected due to be soft, in my opinion, its sharp. Thoughts?

Will happily take any constructive criticism.

https://www.airplane-pictures.net/images/rejected-images/2018-9/1116460.jpg

The screener in question is very harsh and I am not the only one to suffer

Is nice sharp, appeal the photos.

Parts could do with more sharpening (windows, flag etc) but I would say it is probably acceptable is. Appeal is worth a shot. And roger that on the screener. Its pretty bad lol.

I would suggest more sharpening on cockpit's windows, and on the tail (and rear part of fuselage). Or maybe try smaller size - 1440px could be a better choice.

Enda. I have been enjoying your photography. Nice work.

Thank you jetzguy

Enough sharp for me, nice one! Need to come to MAN when the 747s are still flying.

This is where this site falls flat on its face, In one hand you have a nice composed photo that has been rejected for being soft. On the other hand there are a lot of grossly over edited photos which are not creative as the site logo suggests that are as soft as and sometimes blurry. Where is the balance on here with those, there doesnt seem to be any quality control at all anymore and some of the photos that get though screening are ghastly, come on admin get some consistency on here while its still a decent site

^ Not to mention silly censorship of the comments and the forums, whenever someone DARES to criticizes this site, its screeners or the published photos :)